rheb sirna (Cell Signaling Technology Inc)
Structured Review

Rheb Sirna, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 27 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/rheb+sirna/bio_rxiv__64898__2026__02__27__708535-76-19-22?v=Cell+Signaling+Technology+Inc
Average 94 stars, based on 27 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Rheb membrane orientation dynamics and functional consequences elucidated by molecular simulations, single-molecule-FRET and signaling assays"
Article Title: Rheb membrane orientation dynamics and functional consequences elucidated by molecular simulations, single-molecule-FRET and signaling assays
Journal: bioRxiv
doi: 10.64898/2026.02.27.708535
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Structure of Rheb-GDP shown in cartoon with helices colored blue and β-strands light purple. The G-domain is from PDB 1XTQ while the farnsylated C-terminal hypervariable region (HVR) was model-built (see Methods) and attached to a hypothetical membrane for visualization of prenyl insertion into the hydrophobic core of the membrane. Helices α3 (residues 90–107), α4 (residues 131–140), and α5 (residues 153–170) are labeled and the effector binding Switch I (residues 33–41) and Switch II (residues 63–79) regions are highlighted in orange and yellow, respectively. ( B ) Initial model Rheb-GDP in a bilayer of mixed lipids (mol % as indicated) with Rheb shown in gray cartoon except for the farnesyl acyl chain that is in a stick representation (cyan). POPC = palmitoyl-oleoyl-glycero-phosphocholine, POPE = palmitoyl-oleoyl-glycero-phosphoethanolamine, SAPI = stearoyl-arachidonoyl-phosphatidylinositol (also called phosphatidylinositol or PI), and Chol = cholesterol. Water and ions are omitted for clarity.
Techniques Used: Membrane, Labeling, Binding Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Illustration of the tilt angle θ, measured between the membrane normal (N) and a vector along helix α5 (V H5 ; Pro168 Cα → Arg161 Cα). ( B ) Visualization of rotation angle φ on a circular plot (see main text) with an outer wheel highlighting Rheb G-domain structural elements facing the membrane at a given φ. ( C ) Joint normalized probability distribution of φ and θ (P(φ, θ)) projected onto a circular grid with φ along the concentric and θ along the radial coordinate. High-density regions are defined as discrete orientation states (OS), and a representative snapshot of each OS (OS1, OS2, and OS3) is shown at the top with the bilayer in tan surface and Rheb in gray cartoon with a semi-transparent silhouette. Structural regions facing the membrane are colored according to the mapping in panel B. The N-terminus (residues 1-5) and inter-switch loop (residues 50-54) are colored in magenta and sky blue in the relevant orientation.
Techniques Used: Membrane, Plasmid Preparation
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Illustration of MD-guided selection of fluorophore labeling sites. Representative structures of Rheb in two orientations attached to a hypothetical membrane (light blue line), with lobe 1 (residues 1-85) in orange and lobe 2 (residues 86-170) in light blue. A136 and S180 highlighted in purple and green spheres, respectively, represent sites of Cys mutation for fluorophore labeling with the FRET efficiency (E A ) predicted to increase and decrease as the catalytic domain becomes proximal and distal from the membrane. ( B ) Normalized histograms of E A obtained from 34 individual ND-HA-Rheb-A136C/S180C particles (left) and R eff obtained from a 40 μs aggregate MD simulation of GDP- and GTP-bound Rheb (right). See main text for state assignments of the smFRET data and GMM fits of the MD data. ( C ) Comparison of ensemble-averaged MD-derived R eff (x-axis) and smFRET distances (y-axis) for the four states of panel B, with the dashed line indicating an ideal agreement. Standard deviations are shown for R eff (horizontal bars) and smFRET distance (vertical bars). ( D ) Comparison of ensemble sizes with solid bars denoting smFRET and striped bars representing MD.
Techniques Used: Selection, Labeling, Membrane, Mutagenesis, Comparison, Derivative Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Schematic of the spherical polar coordinate system (R eff , φ, θ) used to describe Rheb G-domain membrane orientation, defined by the polar angle θ, azimuthal angle φ, and radial distance R eff . ( B ) View from bottom of the normalized 3D probability density distribution (P(R eff , φ, θ)) derived from a 10-component GMM analysis of the combined GDP- and GTP-Rheb simulations. Contours indicate iso-surfaces at density levels of 0.3, 0.5, and 0.7. ( C ) Equatorial view of P(R eff , φ, θ) with representative structures corresponding to the four major orientation states (OS1-OS4) shown around the sphere. Contour levels are the same as in panel B.
Techniques Used: Membrane, Derivative Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Residue contact frequency (RCF) profiles in each orientation state ensemble (OS1–OS4), highlighting specific lipid-protein interaction patterns. Contact is measured as any protein side chain heavy atom within 4 Å of lipid heavy atom, and frequency is calculated as the proportion of frames where a residue has ≥ 1 contact. Colored vertical bands denote key structural regions: NT (N-terminus), Switch I (SwI), inter-switch (IS), Switch II (SwII), α3, α4, α5, and HVR using the same color scheme as in . ( B ) Representative snapshots illustrating key lipid interactions in OS2 and OS3 with a portion of Rheb shown as gray cartoon and the bilayer as a semi-transparent surface. Residues mutated to Ala for the experiments in C and D are labeled, along with their contacts with lipid head groups (POPE, teal; SAPI, orange; Chol, sand/yellow). Hydrogen bonds are depicted as yellow dashed lines. ( C ) Representative immunoblots of phosphorylated S6 kinase (pS6K; mTORC1 activity readout), total S6K (tS6K), and Rheb expression in Rheb−/− (dKO) cells reconstituted with WT Rheb or the indicated mutants (OS2: S4A/K5A; OS3: N50A/Q52A). ( D ) Quantification of pS6K normalized to total S6K and Rheb expression, expressed as percentage of the WT condition. Points represent independent biological replicates and bars are mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was assessed using pairwise two-tailed t-tests on the normalized ratios (prior to WT scaling). P < 0.05; ***P < 0.0001.
Techniques Used: Residue, Labeling, Western Blot, Activity Assay, Expressing, Two Tailed Test
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Silhouette of the experimental Rheb–mTORC1 complex (PDB 9ED4) with major subunits labeled. ( B ) Representative Rheb structures from each orientation state (OS1–OS4) were aligned to the Rheb subunit in the experimental complex, and the same rigid-body transformation was applied to the full mTORC1 assembly to place the complex into the membrane reference frame defined by each simulated orientation. In OS1, OS2, and OS4, mTORC1 sterically clashes the membrane, whereas OS3 positions the complex above the bilayer with minimal clashes. ( C ) Assembly of an mTORC1 complex bound to two Rheb structures in OS3 generated by independently aligning them to the corresponding Rheb structures in the experimental complex, demonstrating that OS3 uniquely permits simultaneous, membrane-compatible engagement of both Rheb binding sites. ( D ) Schematics describing kinetic gateway mechanisms wherein the continuous exchange between the occluded OS1 and the signaling-competent OS3 observed in WT Rheb is disrupted by N-terminal S4A/K5A OS2 mutations, resulting in the system being “locked” in OS1 and unable to access OS2 or the rest of the states and thus reducing signaling. Likewise, the inter-switch N50A/Q52 OS3 mutation may destabilize the intermediate states, which also display significant inter-switch loop-membrane contacts, thereby shifting the population to OS3. ( E ) An alternative mechanism of OS3 mutant gain-of-function, wherein the N50A/Q52A mutation destabilizes OS3 membrane contacts and decrease the population of membrane proximal conformations and increasing the mTORC1-capturable Rheb extended fraction (see ref ).
Techniques Used: Labeling, Transformation Assay, Membrane, Generated, Binding Assay, Mutagenesis

